Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37301860›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

Ethnic minority women's experiences of accessing antenatal care in high income European countries: a systematic review.

Esther Sharma, Pei-Ching Tseng, Angela Harden, Leah Li, Shuby Puthussery

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Esther SharmaMaternal and Child Health Research Centre, Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Park Square Rm B201, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 3JU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-7501
Pei-Ching TsengMaternal and Child Health Research Centre, Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Park Square Rm B201, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 3JU, UK.
Angela HardenSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Health Services Research and Management, City, University of London, Northampton Square London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Leah LiPopulation, Policy and Practice Programme, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3603-6457
Shuby PuthusseryMaternal and Child Health Research Centre, Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Park Square Rm B201, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 3JU, UK. shuby.puthussery@beds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1865-9546

Funding

Wellbeing of Women RG2245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen from ethnic minority backgrounds are at greater risk of adverse maternal outcomes. Antenatal care plays a crucial role in reducing risks of poor outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise, and synthesise the recent qualitative evidence on ethnic minority women's experiences of accessing antenatal care in high-income European countries, and to develop a novel conceptual framework for access based on women's perspectives.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of seven electronic databases in addition to manual searches to identify all qualitative studies published between January 2010 and May 2021. Identified articles were screened in two stages against the inclusion criteria with titles and abstracts screened first followed by full-text screening. Included studies were quality appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and extracted data were synthesised using a 'best fit' framework, based on an existing theoretical model of health care access.

resultsA total of 30 studies were included in this review. Women's experiences covered two overarching themes: 'provision of antenatal care' and 'women's uptake of antenatal care'. The 'provision of antenatal care' theme included five sub-themes: promotion of antenatal care importance, making contact and getting to antenatal care, costs of antenatal care, interactions with antenatal care providers and models of antenatal care provision. The 'women's uptake of antenatal care' theme included seven sub-themes: delaying initiation of antenatal care, seeking antenatal care, help from others in accessing antenatal care, engaging with antenatal care, previous experiences of interacting with maternity services, ability to communicate, and immigration status. A novel conceptual model was developed from these themes.

conclusionThe findings demonstrated the multifaceted and cyclical nature of initial and ongoing access to antenatal care for ethnic minority women. Structural and organisational factors played a significant role in women's ability to access antenatal care. Participants in majority of the included studies were women newly arrived in the host country, highlighting the need for research to be conducted across different generations of ethnic minority women taking into account the duration of stay in the host country where they accessed antenatal care. PROTOCOL AND REGISTRATION: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (reference number CRD42021238115).

Indexed as

EthnicityPrenatal CareEthnic and Racial MinoritiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMinority GroupsPregnancyQualitative ResearchAntenatal careEthnic minorityEuropeMaternal healthQualitative evidence synthesis

Identifiers

PMID37301860
PMCPMC10256965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.