Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37301853›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems.

Yoo Jin Choi, Nguyen Thanh Sang, Hye-Sung Jo, Dong-Sik Kim, Young-Dong Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yoo Jin Choi *Division of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Nguyen Thanh Sang *Division of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Hye-Sung JoDivision of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Dong-Sik KimDivision of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Young-Dong YuDivision of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryeodae-ro Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea. hust1351@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3452-338X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery is usually more beneficial than open surgeries in various fields of surgery. With the newly developed Single-Port (SP) robotic surgical system, even single-site surgery has become easier to access. We compared single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between the Si/Xi and SP systems. This retrospective single-center study enrolled patients who underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between July 2014 and July 2021. The clinical outcomes of the da Vinci Si/Xi and SP systems were compared. In total, 334 patients underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (118 Si/Xi vs. 216 SP). The SP group had more chronic or acute cholecystitis than the Si/Xi group did. There was more bile spillage in the Si/Xi group during the surgery. The total operative and docking times were significantly shorter in the SP group. There was no difference in the postoperative outcomes. The SP system is safe and feasible regarding comparable postoperative complication rates and is more convenient regarding docking and techniques.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical WoundCholecystectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37301853
PMCPMC10257706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.