Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37301831›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2023

Wear effects between polymethyl methacrylate occlusal splints and opposing dentin surfaces during bruxism mimicking events.

Prangtip Potewiratnanond, Cholakorn Ekrojanakul, Tatcharee Harikul, Rapatporn Kositvanich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prangtip PotewiratnanondDepartment of Occlusion, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Prangtip.p@chula.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-755X
Cholakorn EkrojanakulFaculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tatcharee HarikulFaculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rapatporn KositvanichFaculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the surface wear rate between polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-based occlusal splints and opposing dentin-exposed teeth in bruxism simulating models. MATERIALS AND

methodsPMMA-based occlusal splints and extracted premolars were tested on a chewing stimulator at 30,000 or 60,000 cycles. Dentin wear was measured under a stereomicroscope and PMMA wear was determined with an optical profilometer. In addition, wear surface topography was assessed and quantified by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

resultsWear rate of PMMA was significantly greater (11 times) than that of dentin specimens at 60,000 cycles, though these findings were not observed at 30,000 cycles. When comparing wear rates within each group at different duration cycles, PMMA surfaces exhibited an average wear rate 1.4 times higher with high duration cycles, while dentin surfaces displayed a marginal decrease in wear. In SEM micrographs, PMMA surfaces displayed more wear abrasion lines with higher duration cycles. However, dentin surfaces did not exhibit major differences between low and high duration cycles.

conclusionWear rate on PMMA-based occlusal splints remarkably increases upon high chewing cycles mimicking bruxism comparing with the rate on dentin. Hence, it is reasonable for bruxing patients to wear single-arch PMMA-based occlusal splints to protect opposing dentin-exposed teeth.

Identifiers

PMID37301831
PMCPMC10257649
OpenAlexW4380152682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.