ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
Comparison of patterns and rates of cement leakage in percutaneous sacroplasty for sacral insufficiency fractures versus neoplasia.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiculopathy due to cement extravasation after sacroplasty: A case report.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePercutaneous sacroplasty is a minimally invasive procedure which utilises injection of bone cement into the sacrum for stabilisation of osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF) and neoplastic lesions to relieve pain and improve function. While effective, cement leakage is an important complication associated with the procedure. This study aims to compare the incidence and patterns of the cement leakages following sacroplasty for SIF versus neoplasia and discuss the various patterns of cement leakage and their implications. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study analysed 57 patients who underwent percutaneous sacroplasty at a tertiary orthopaedic hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups of SIF (n=46) and neoplastic lesions (n=11) based on their indication for sacroplasty. Pre- and post-procedural CT fluoroscopy was used to assess for cement leakage. The incidence and patterns of cement leakage were both compared among the two groups. A Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis.
resultsEleven (19%) patients had cement leakage on post-procedural imaging. The most common sites of cement leakage were into the presacral region (6), followed by sacroiliac joints (4), sacral foramina (3) and posterior sacral (1). There was a statistically significant higher incidence of leakage in the neoplastic group in comparison to SIF group (P-value <0.05). The incidence of cement leakage in the neoplastic group was 45% (n = 5/11) versus SIF 13% (n=6/46).
conclusionThere was a statistically significant higher incidence of cement leak in sacroplasties conducted for the treatment of neoplastic lesions compared to those with sacral insufficiency fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.