Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37300888›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2023

The experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a cross sectional study.

Yung-Yeh Su, Ying-Jui Chao, Chih-Jung Wang, Ting-Kai Liao, Ping-Jui Su, Chien-Jui Huang, Nai-Jung Chiang, Yu-Ting Yu, Hong-Ming Tsai, Li-Tzong Chen and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Spatial Configuration of Pancreatic Cancer Is Associated with Disease Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative-Intent Resection.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  3. A New CA19-9 Cutoff Value Identifies Lewis Antigen Status and Refines Prognostic Stratification in PDAC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Surgery in Older Cancer Patients.Current oncology reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yung-Yeh SuDepartments of Oncology.ORCID 0000-0002-5133-5316
Ying-Jui ChaoSurgery.
Chih-Jung WangSurgery.ORCID 0000-0002-7625-2891
Ting-Kai LiaoSurgery.ORCID 0000-0003-4742-8066
Ping-Jui SuSurgery.
Chien-Jui HuangInternal Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-5503-9266
Nai-Jung ChiangNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institute, Tainan.
Yu-Ting YuPathology.
Hong-Ming TsaiMedical Imaging, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital.
Li-Tzong ChenDepartments of Oncology.
Yan-Shen ShanSurgery.ORCID 0000-0002-2457-5189
National Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpfront resection (UR) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer. There is increasing evidence suggesting favourable outcomes toward neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery.

methodsAll clinical staging with resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated at a tertiary medical centre from 2013 to 2020 were identified. The baseline characteristics, treatment course, surgery outcome and survival results of UR or NAC were compared.

resultsFinally, in 159 resectable patients, 46 patients (29%) underwent NAC and 113 patients (71%) received UR. In NAC, 11 patients (24%) did not receive resection, 4 (36.4%) for comorbidity, 2 (18.2%) for patient refusal and 2 (18.2%) for disease progression. In UR, 13 patients (12%) were unresectable intraoperatively; 6 (46.2%) for locally advanced and 5 (38.5%) for distant metastasis. Overall, 97% of patients in NAC and 58% of patients in UR completed adjuvant chemotherapy. As of data cut-off, 24 patients (69%) in NAC and 42 patients (29%) in UR were still tumour free. The median recurrence-free survival in NAC, UR with adjuvant chemotherapy and without adjuvant chemotherapy were 31.3 months (95% CI, 14.4-not estimable), 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.0-14.3) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-11.8), P =0.036; and the median overall survival in each group were not reached (95% CI, 29.7-not estimable), 25.9 months (95% CI, 21.1-40.5) and 21.7 months (12.0-32.8), P =0.0053. Based on initial clinical staging, the median overall survival of NAC was not significantly different from UR with a tumour less than or equal to 2 cm, P =0.29. NAC patients had a higher R0 resection rate (83% versus 53%), lower recurrence rate (31% versus 71%) and harvested median number lymph node (23 versus 15).

conclusionThis study demonstrates that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID37300888
PMCPMC10498854
OpenAlexW4380147779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.