Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37300746›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Identifying the Professional Development Needs Among Early Career Doctorally Prepared Oncology Professionals.

Jacqueline Galica, Marian Luctkar-Flude, Amina Silva, Jiahui Wong, Mary-Jane Esplen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacqueline GalicaSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, 92 Barrie Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. jacqueline.galica@queensu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-2472
Marian Luctkar-FludeSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, 92 Barrie Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-1187
Amina SilvaSchool of Nursing, Queen's University, 92 Barrie Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0972-8212
Jiahui Wongde Souza Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0369-2455
Mary-Jane EsplenDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6034-2235

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the professional development needs of early career doctorally prepared professionals in psychosocial oncology. We used a cross-sectional descriptive survey design to assess professionally related skills deemed most important to participants' academic excellence and promotion, skills they felt most and least confident to engage in, and those they were most interested to learn more about. Seventeen participants completed the survey and were, on average, 39.3 years of age (range 29-55 years) and had completed doctoral or post-doctoral training 3.1 years previously (range 0-5 years). Participants identified seeking external funding as not only the most important skill to achieve their academic excellence and promotion, but also as the skill they felt least confident to engage in. They felt most confident to engage in career planning and getting published and were most interested to learn more about how to negotiate a career/position. Participants also expressed interest in having access to a forum wherein they could collaborate with others and receive mentorship from expert oncology professionals with doctoral degrees. The findings from this study point to the need for professional development opportunities for oncology professionals before and after they complete their doctoral or post-doctoral training. Study participants' perspectives offer insights about topics that may be enhanced in doctoral and post-doctoral mentorship programs.

Indexed as

Education, GraduatePhysiciansAdultCareer ChoiceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMentorsMiddle AgedProfessional developmentPsychosocial oncologySurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.