ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance: a comparison study between EOS and MRI in the paediatric population.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to compare the relative reliability and accuracy of TT-TG measurements in EOS with that of MRI in a paediatric population.
methodsPatients were included if they underwent both an MRI and EOS scans and were under the age of 16. Two authors recorded the TT-TG distances on each modality at two separate time points. In the EOS images, the distance between the two points was measured in the horizontal 2D plane. In the MRI images, it was done in the plane referenced by posterior femoral condylar axis. The intra- and inter-rater reliability was assessed in each modality and between modalities.
resultsTwenty-seven patients (30 knees), 14 males, and 13 females with an average age of 13 years (range: 7-16 years) were included in the study. The mean TT-TG distance on EOS scan and MRI scan was 14 mm. On inter- and intra-observer analysis, both imaging modalities had excellent reliability (0.97 ICC for EOS and 0.98 ICC for MRI inter-observer) and repeatability (0.98-0.99 ICC for EOS and 0.99 ICC for MRI for intra-observer). However, on comparing the two imaging modalities (EOS vs MRI), the ICC was fair (0.56 ICC for rater 1 and 0.65 ICC for rater 2).
conclusionWhile the EOS TT-TG measurements were precise and reproducible, they were only moderately comparable to MRI TT-TG measurements. Consequently, EOS TT-TG measurements should not be used for decision-making without the development of EOS-specific TT-TG values that indicate the need for distal realignment surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.