Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37300561›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2023

Work in nursing homes and occupational exposure to endotoxin and bacterial and fungal species.

Pil Uthaug Rasmussen, Katrine Uhrbrand, Margit W Frederiksen, Anne Mette Madsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pil Uthaug RasmussenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0607-4230
Katrine UhrbrandNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9118-8448
Margit W FrederiksenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-1171
Anne Mette MadsenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5895-7521
National Research Centre for the Working Environment · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor microbial exposure may cause negative health effects. Only little is known about the occupational microbial exposure in nursing homes and the factors that influence the exposure. The exposure in nursing homes may be increased due to close contact with elderly persons who may carry infectious or antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms and due to handling of laundry, such as used clothing and bed linen. We investigated the microbial exposure in 5 nursing homes in Denmark, by use of personal bioaerosol samples from different groups of staff members taken during a typical working day, stationary bioaerosol measurements taken during various work tasks, sedimented dust samples, environmental surface swabs, and swabs from staff members' hands. From the samples, we explored bacterial and fungal concentrations and species composition, endotoxin levels, and antimicrobial resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. Microbial concentrations from personal exposure samples differed among professions, and geometric means (GM) were 2,159 cfu/m3 (84 to 1.5 × 105) for bacteria incubated on nutrient agar, 1,745 cfu/m3 (82 to 2.0 × 104) for bacteria cultivated on a Staphylococcus selective agar, and 16 cfu/m3 air for potential pathogenic fungi incubated at 37 °C (below detection limit to 257). Bacterial exposures were elevated during bed making. On surfaces, the highest bacterial concentrations were found on bed railings. The majority of bacterial species found were related to the human skin microflora, such as different Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium species. Endotoxin levels ranged from 0.02 to 59.0 EU/m3, with a GM of 1.5 EU/m3. Of 40 tested A. fumigatus isolates, we found one multiresistant isolate, which was resistant towards both itraconazole and voriconazole, and one isolate resistant towards amphotericin B. In conclusion, we give an overview of the general microbial exposure in nursing homes and show that microbial exposures are higher for staff with more care and nursing tasks compared with administrative staff.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalAnti-Infective AgentsOccupational ExposureAgarAgedBacteriaEndotoxinsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansStaphylococcusAgarAir Pollutants, OccupationalAnti-Infective AgentsEndotoxinsantibiotic resistanceazolebioaerosolshealthcare worker (HCW)long-term care facility (LTCF)occupational health

Identifiers

PMID37300561
PMCPMC10410494
OpenAlexW4380225130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.