Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37300501›Full record

ArticleBiomacromolecules2023

Synthetic Star Nanoengineered Antimicrobial Polymers as Antibiofilm Agents: Bacterial Membrane Disruption and Cell Aggregation.

Sophie Laroque, Ramón Garcia Maset, Alexia Hapeshi, Fannie Burgevin, Katherine E S Locock, Sébastien Perrier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomacromolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bioinspired Cationic Antimicrobial Polymers.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ring-opening metathesis polymerization ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie LaroqueDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-2151-5762
Ramón Garcia MasetDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.
Alexia HapeshiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-5717-0532
Fannie BurgevinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.
Katherine E S LocockCSIRO Manufacturing, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0180-7837
Sébastien PerrierDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-9046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance has become a worldwide issue, with multiresistant bacterial strains emerging at an alarming rate. Multivalent antimicrobial polymer architectures such as bottle brush or star polymers have shown great potential, as they could lead to enhanced binding and interaction with the bacterial cell membrane. In this study, a library of amphiphilic star copolymers and their linear copolymer equivalents, based on acrylamide monomers, were synthesized via RAFT polymerization. Their monomer distribution and molecular weight were varied. Subsequently, their antimicrobial activity toward a Gram-negative bacterium (

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsPolymersAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID37300501
PMCPMC10336841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.