Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37300499›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2023

How should we measure physical activity after stroke? An international consensus.

Natalie A Fini, Dawn Simpson, Sarah A Moore, Niruthikha Mahendran, Janice J Eng, Karen Borschmann, David Moulaee Conradsson, Sebastien Chastin, Leonid Churilov, Coralie English

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Home-Based Behaviour Change Intervention With Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity in People With Stroke and Diabetes-A Feasibility and Safety Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natalie A FiniPhysiotherapy Department, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5474-6404
Dawn SimpsonCentre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Florey Institute of Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9386-4830
Sarah A MooreDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Niruthikha MahendranCentre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Florey Institute of Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Janice J EngDepartment of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-0788
Karen BorschmannCentre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Florey Institute of Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David Moulaee ConradssonDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sebastien ChastinInstitute of Applied Health Research, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Leonid ChurilovCentre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Florey Institute of Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Coralie EnglishCentre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Florey Institute of Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5910-7927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity is important for secondary stroke prevention. Currently, there is inconsistency of outcomes and tools used to measure physical activity following stroke.

aimTo establish internationally agreed recommendations to enable consistent measurement of post-stroke physical activity.

methodsStroke survivors and carers were surveyed online once regarding what is important in physical activity measurement. Three survey rounds with expert stroke researchers and clinicians were conducted using Keeney's Value-Focused Thinking Methodology. Survey 1 identified physical activity tools, outcomes, and measurement considerations which were ranked in Survey 2. Consensus recommendations on tools were then formulated by the consensus group based on survey responses. In Survey 3, participants reviewed ranked results and evidence gathered to determine their support for consensus recommendations.

resultsTwenty-five stroke survivors, 5 carers, 18 researchers, and 17 clinicians from 16 countries participated. Time in moderate-vigorous physical activity and step count were identified as the most important outcomes to measure. Key measurement considerations included the ability to measure across frequency, intensity, duration domains in real-world settings; user-friendliness, comfort, and ability to detect changes. Consensus recommendations included using the Actigraph, Actical, and Activ8 devices for physical activity intensity; ActivPAL for duration and Step Activity Monitor for frequency; and the IPAQ and PASE questionnaires. Survey 3 indicated 100% support for device and 96% for questionnaire recommendations.

conclusionsThese consensus recommendations can guide selection of physical activity measurement tools and outcomes. Tool selection will depend on measurement purpose, user-knowledge, and resources. Comprehensive measurement requires the use of devices and questionnaires.

Indexed as

StrokeCaregiversExerciseHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesconsensusdevicemeasurementPhysical activityquestionnairerehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID37300499
PMCPMC10614172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.