Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37300327›Full record

ArticleAging cell2023

Explainable machine learning framework to predict personalized physiological aging.

David Bernard, Emmanuel Doumard, Isabelle Ader, Philippe Kemoun, Jean-Christophe Pagès, Anne Galinier, Sylvain Cussat-Blanc, Felix Furger, Luigi Ferrucci, Julien Aligon and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

David BernardRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.
Emmanuel DoumardRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.
Isabelle AderRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.
Philippe KemounRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.
Jean-Christophe PagèsRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.
Anne GalinierRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.
Sylvain Cussat-BlancUniversité Toulouse 1 - Capitole, Institute of Research in Informatics (IRIT) of Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Felix FurgerRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.
Luigi FerrucciBiomedical Research Centre, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6273-1613
Julien AligonUniversité Toulouse 1 - Capitole, Institute of Research in Informatics (IRIT) of Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Cyrille DelpierreCERPOP, UMR1295 (Equity), Université P. Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Luc PénicaudRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.
Paul MonsarratRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5473-6035
Louis CasteillaRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attaining personalized healthy aging requires accurate monitoring of physiological changes and identifying subclinical markers that predict accelerated or delayed aging. Classic biostatistical methods most rely on supervised variables to estimate physiological aging and do not capture the full complexity of inter-parameter interactions. Machine learning (ML) is promising, but its black box nature eludes direct understanding, substantially limiting physician confidence and clinical usage. Using a broad population dataset from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) study including routine biological variables and after selection of XGBoost as the most appropriate algorithm, we created an innovative explainable ML framework to determine a Personalized physiological age (PPA). PPA predicted both chronic disease and mortality independently of chronological age. Twenty-six variables were sufficient to predict PPA. Using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), we implemented a precise quantitative associated metric for each variable explaining physiological (i.e., accelerated or delayed) deviations from age-specific normative data. Among the variables, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) displays a major relative weight in the estimation of PPA. Finally, clustering profiles of identical contextualized explanations reveal different aging trajectories opening opportunities to specific clinical follow-up. These data show that PPA is a robust, quantitative and explainable ML-based metric that monitors personalized health status. Our approach also provides a complete framework applicable to different datasets or variables, allowing precision physiological age estimation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHealth StatusMachine LearningNutrition Surveysartificial intelligencebiological ageExplainabilityhealthy agingmachine learningpersonalized medicinephysiological ageRejuvenative therapy

Identifiers

PMID37300327
PMCPMC10410015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.