ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Exploring Research on the Construction and Application of Knowledge Graphs for Aircraft Fault Diagnosis.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge-Graph-Driven Fault Diagnosis Methods for Intelligent Production Lines.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An intelligent guided troubleshooting method for aircraft based on HybirdRAG.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Multi-Task Causal Knowledge Fault Diagnosis Method for PMSM-ITSF Based on Meta-Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-Objective Power Supply Restoration in Distribution Networks Based on Graph Calculation and Information Collected by Multi-Source Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Explicit and Implicit Feature Contrastive Learning Model for Knowledge Graph Link Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fault Knowledge Graph Construction and Platform Development for Aircraft PHM.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Fault diagnosis is crucial for repairing aircraft and ensuring their proper functioning. However, with the higher complexity of aircraft, some traditional diagnosis methods that rely on experience are becoming less effective. Therefore, this paper explores the construction and application of an aircraft fault knowledge graph to improve the efficiency of fault diagnosis for maintenance engineers. Firstly, this paper analyzes the knowledge elements required for aircraft fault diagnosis, and defines a schema layer of a fault knowledge graph. Secondly, with deep learning as the main method and heuristic rules as the auxiliary method, fault knowledge is extracted from structured and unstructured fault data, and a fault knowledge graph for a certain type of craft is constructed. Finally, a fault question-answering system based on a fault knowledge graph was developed, which can accurately answer questions from maintenance engineers. The practical implementation of our proposed methodology highlights how knowledge graphs provide an effective means of managing aircraft fault knowledge, ultimately assisting engineers in identifying fault roots accurately and quickly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.