ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
An Assessment of In-the-Wild Datasets for Multimodal Emotion Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Wearable Sensors for Learning Analytics: Trends, Challenges, and Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Dual-Branch Multi-Dimensional Attention Mechanism for Joint Facial Expression Detection and Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Facial Expression Recognition-You Only Look Once-Neighborhood Coordinate Attention Mamba: Facial Expression Detection and Classification Based on Neighbor and Coordinates Attention Mechanism.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Combined CNN Architecture for Speech Emotion Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal emotion recognition implies the use of different resources and techniques for identifying and recognizing human emotions. A variety of data sources such as faces, speeches, voices, texts and others have to be processed simultaneously for this recognition task. However, most of the techniques, which are based mainly on Deep Learning, are trained using datasets designed and built in controlled conditions, making their applicability in real contexts with real conditions more difficult. For this reason, the aim of this work is to assess a set of in-the-wild datasets to show their strengths and weaknesses for multimodal emotion recognition. Four in-the-wild datasets are evaluated: AFEW, SFEW, MELD and AffWild2. A multimodal architecture previously designed is used to perform the evaluation and classical metrics such as accuracy and F1-Score are used to measure performance in training and to validate quantitative results. However, strengths and weaknesses of these datasets for various uses indicate that by themselves they are not appropriate for multimodal recognition due to their original purpose, e.g., face or speech recognition. Therefore, we recommend a combination of multiple datasets in order to obtain better results when new samples are being processed and a good balance in the number of samples by class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.