Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37299826›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Differentiation between Phyllodes Tumors and Fibroadenomas through Breast Ultrasound: Deep-Learning Model Outperforms Ultrasound Physicians.

Zhaoting Shi, Yebo Ma, Xiaowen Ma, Anqi Jin, Jin Zhou, Na Li, Danli Sheng, Cai Chang, Jiangang Chen, Jiawei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hierarchical diagnosis of breast phyllodes tumors enabled by deep learning of ultrasound images: a retrospective multi-center study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Fibroepithelial lesions: assessing the risk of malignant phyllodes tumors in the breast.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhaoting ShiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yebo MaShanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, School of Communication and Electronic Engineering, East China Normal University, No. 500, Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.
Xiaowen MaDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.
Anqi JinDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jin ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.
Na LiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.
Danli ShengDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.
Cai ChangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jiangang ChenShanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, School of Communication and Electronic Engineering, East China Normal University, No. 500, Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China.
Jiawei LiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81830058, 82102070, 82001839National Natural Science Foundation of China 82151318Scientific Development funds for Local Region from the Chinese Government in 2023 XZ202301YD0032C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preoperative differentiation of breast phyllodes tumors (PTs) from fibroadenomas (FAs) plays a critical role in identifying an appropriate surgical treatment. Although several imaging modalities are available, reliable differentiation between PT and FA remains a great challenge for radiologists in clinical work. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis has shown promise in distinguishing PT from FA. However, a very small sample size was adopted in previous studies. In this work, we retrospectively enrolled 656 breast tumors (372 FAs and 284 PTs) with 1945 ultrasound images in total. Two experienced ultrasound physicians independently evaluated the ultrasound images. Meanwhile, three deep-learning models (i.e., ResNet, VGG, and GoogLeNet) were applied to classify FAs and PTs. The robustness of the models was evaluated by fivefold cross validation. The performance of each model was assessed by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated. Among the three models, the ResNet model yielded the highest AUC value, of 0.91, with an accuracy value of 95.3%, a sensitivity value of 96.2%, and a specificity value of 94.7% in the testing data set. In contrast, the two physicians yielded an average AUC value of 0.69, an accuracy value of 70.7%, a sensitivity value of 54.4%, and a specificity value of 53.2%. Our findings indicate that the diagnostic performance of deep learning is better than that of physicians in the distinction of PTs from FAs. This further suggests that AI is a valuable tool for aiding clinical diagnosis, thereby advancing precision therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFibroadenomaPhyllodes TumorPhysiciansArtificial IntelligenceDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansRetrospective Studiesbreastdeep learningfibroadenomaphyllodes tumorultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37299826
PMCPMC10255878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.