ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Subgraph Learning for Topological Geolocalization with Graph Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing Sensor Integrity for Nuclear Waste Monitoring Using Graph Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the challenges of spatial cognition, such as self-localization and navigation, is to develop an efficient learning approach capable of mimicking human ability. This paper proposes a novel approach for topological geolocalization on the map using motion trajectory and graph neural networks. Specifically, our learning method learns an embedding of the motion trajectory encoded as a path subgraph where the node and edge represent turning direction and relative distance information by training a graph neural network. We formulate the subgraph learning as a multi-class classification problem in which the output node IDs are interpreted as the object's location on the map. After training using three map datasets with small, medium, and large sizes, the node localization tests on simulated trajectories generated from the map show 93.61%, 95.33%, and 87.50% accuracy, respectively. We also demonstrate similar accuracy for our approach on actual trajectories generated by visual-inertial odometry. The key benefits of our approach are as follows: (1) we take advantage of the powerful graph-modeling ability of neural graph networks, (2) it only requires a map in the form of a 2D graph, and (3) it only requires an affordable sensor that generates relative motion trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.