Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37299121›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

How Scarification, GA

Patrícia Duarte de Oliveira Paiva, Diogo Pedrosa Correa da Silva, Bruna Raphaella da Silva, Israela Pimenta de Sousa, Renato Paiva, Michele Valquíria Dos Reis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrícia Duarte de Oliveira PaivaDepartamento de Agricultura, Escola de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7997-8420
Diogo Pedrosa Correa da SilvaDepartamento de Agricultura, Escola de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-7500
Bruna Raphaella da SilvaDepartamento de Biologia, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil.
Israela Pimenta de SousaDepartamento de Biologia, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil.
Renato PaivaDepartamento de Biologia, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil.
Michele Valquíria Dos ReisDepartamento de Agricultura, Escola de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0379-2384
Universidade Federal de Lavras · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior scholarshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais scholarshipNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development grantNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The propagation of strelitzia plants can be carried out in vitro as an alternative to combine the aseptic conditions of the culture medium with the use of strategies to promote germination and controlled abiotic conditions. However, this technique is still limited by the prolonged time and low percentage of seed germination, which is the most viable explant source, due to dormancy. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of chemical and physical scarification processes of seeds combined with gibberellic acid (GA

Indexed as

antioxidant systembird-of-paradisedormancy breakin vitro propagationnanomaterialsStrelitzia reginae

Identifiers

PMID37299121
PMCPMC10255328
OpenAlexW4378716466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.