Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37299118›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Looking beyond Virus Detection in RNA Sequencing Data: Lessons Learned from a Community-Based Effort to Detect Cellular Plant Pathogens and Pests.

Annelies Haegeman, Yoika Foucart, Kris De Jonghe, Thomas Goedefroit, Maher Al Rwahnih, Neil Boonham, Thierry Candresse, Yahya Z A Gaafar, Oscar P Hurtado-Gonzales, Zala Kogej Zwitter and 18 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unveiling thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. In-depth population genetic study ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 15 institutions in 10 countries.

Annelies HaegemanPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-5368
Yoika FoucartPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Kris De JonghePlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1763-5654
Thomas GoedefroitPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Maher Al RwahnihFoundation Plant Services, Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-9234
Neil BoonhamSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Thierry CandresseUMR 1332 Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Université de Bordeaux, 33882 Villenave-d'Ornon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9757-1835
Yahya Z A GaafarCentre for Plant Health, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 8801 East Saanich Road, North Saanich, BC V8L 1H3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7833-1542
Oscar P Hurtado-GonzalesPlant Germplasm Quarantine Program, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-APHIS), Beltsville, ML 20705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9561-7016
Zala Kogej ZwitterDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology (NIB), 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8146-2906
Denis KutnjakDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology (NIB), 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-5327-0587
Janja LamovšekPlant Protection Department, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia (KIS), 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marie LefebvreUMR 1332 Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Université de Bordeaux, 33882 Villenave-d'Ornon, France.
Martha MalapiBiotechnology Risk Analysis Program, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-APHIS), Riverdale, ML 20737, USA.
Irena Mavrič PleškoPlant Protection Department, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia (KIS), 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Serkan ÖnderDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Odunpazarı, Eskişehir 26160, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8954-8707
Jean-Sébastien ReynardDepartment of Plant Protection, Agroscope, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-107X
Ferran Salavert PamblancoSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Olivier SchumppDepartment of Plant Protection, Agroscope, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2070-2144
Kristian StevensFoundation Plant Services, Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Chandan PalZespri International Limited, 400 Maunganui Road, Mount Maunganui 3116, New Zealand.
Lucie TamisierUnités GAFL et Pathologie Végétale, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), 84143 Montfavet, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9231-2997
Çiğdem Ulubaş SerçeDepartment of Plant Production and Technologies, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, 51240 Niğde, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5337-5883
Inge van DuivenbodeDutch General Inspection Service for Agricultural Seed and Seed Potatoes (NAK), Randweg 14, 8304 AS Emmeloord, The Netherlands.
David W WaitePlant Health and Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, Auckland 1140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0184-2942
Xiaojun HuPlant Germplasm Quarantine Program, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-APHIS), Beltsville, ML 20705, USA.
Heiko ZiebellInstitute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0059-1595
Sébastien MassartPlant Pathology Laboratory, University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USAgricultural institute of Slovenia · SIAgroscope · CHNewcastle University · GBPlant (United States) · USUniversité de Bordeaux · FRCanadian Food Inspection Agency · CAEskişehir Osmangazi University · TRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRJožef Stefan International Postgraduate School · SIJulius Kühn-Institut · DEMinistry for Primary Industries · NZNational Institute of Biology · SINiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi · TRUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

FPS Health Belgium 2018-A-289Slovenian Research Agency P4-0072, L7-2632 and P4-0165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing (HTS), more specifically RNA sequencing of plant tissues, has become an indispensable tool for plant virologists to detect and identify plant viruses. During the data analysis step, plant virologists typically compare the obtained sequences to reference virus databases. In this way, they are neglecting sequences without homologies to viruses, which usually represent the majority of sequencing reads. We hypothesized that traces of other pathogens might be detected in this unused sequence data. In the present study, our goal was to investigate whether total RNA-seq data, as generated for plant virus detection, is also suitable for the detection of other plant pathogens and pests. As proof of concept, we first analyzed RNA-seq datasets of plant materials with confirmed infections by cellular pathogens in order to check whether these non-viral pathogens could be easily detected in the data. Next, we set up a community effort to re-analyze existing Illumina RNA-seq datasets used for virus detection to check for the potential presence of non-viral pathogens or pests. In total, 101 datasets from 15 participants derived from 51 different plant species were re-analyzed, of which 37 were selected for subsequent in-depth analyses. In 29 of the 37 selected samples (78%), we found convincing traces of non-viral plant pathogens or pests. The organisms most frequently detected in this way were fungi (15/37 datasets), followed by insects (13/37) and mites (9/37). The presence of some of the detected pathogens was confirmed by independent (q)PCRs analyses. After communicating the results, 6 out of the 15 participants indicated that they were unaware of the possible presence of these pathogens in their sample(s). All participants indicated that they would broaden the scope of their bioinformatic analyses in future studies and thus check for the presence of non-viral pathogens. In conclusion, we show that it is possible to detect non-viral pathogens or pests from total RNA-seq datasets, in this case primarily fungi, insects, and mites. With this study, we hope to raise awareness among plant virologists that their data might be useful for fellow plant pathologists in other disciplines (mycology, entomology, bacteriology) as well.

Indexed as

diagnosticshigh-throughput sequencingmetagenomicsmetatranscriptomicsplant pathogenRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID37299118
PMCPMC10255714
OpenAlexW4378651302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.