ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023
How Accurate Can Crystal Structure Predictions Be for High-Energy Molecular Crystals?
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Biological Potency of Carotenoids Against Alzheimer's Disease: An Integrated Approach of Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- From structural insight to molecule: Integrative molecular simulations identify candidate pyruvate kinase activators.PloS one · 2026Article
- From Deep-Sea Natural Product to Optimized Therapeutics: Computational Design of Marizomib Analogs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Rescuing Verubecestat: An Integrative Molecular Modeling and Simulation Approach for Designing Next-Generation BACE1 Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A review of large language models and autonomous agents in chemistry.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Prioritizing Computational Cocrystal Prediction Methods for Experimental Researchers: A Review to Find Efficient, Cost-Effective, and User-Friendly Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular crystals have shallow potential energy landscapes, with multiple local minima separated by very small differences in total energy. Predicting molecular packing and molecular conformation in the crystal generally requires ab initio methods of high accuracy, especially when polymorphs are involved. We used dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D) to assess the capabilities of an evolutionary algorithm (EA) for the crystal structure prediction (CSP) of well-known but challenging high-energy molecular crystals (HMX, RDX, CL-20, and FOX-7). While providing the EA with the experimental conformation of the molecule quickly re-discovers the experimental packing, it is more realistic to start instead from a naïve, flat, or neutral initial conformation, which reflects the limited experimental knowledge we generally have in the computational design of molecular crystals. By doing so, and using fully flexible molecules in fully variable unit cells, we show that the experimental structures can be predicted in fewer than 20 generations. Nonetheless, one must be aware that some molecular crystals have naturally hindered evolutions, requiring as many attempts as there are space groups of interest to predict their structures, and some may require the accuracy of all-electron calculations to discriminate between closely ranked structures. To save resources in this computationally demanding process, we showed that a hybrid xTB/DFT-D approach could be considered in a subsequent study to push the limits of CSP beyond 200+ atoms and for cocrystals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.