Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37298037›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Development of Machine-Learning Models for Tinnitus-Related Distress Classification Using Wavelet-Transformed Auditory Evoked Potential Signals and Clinical Data.

Ourania Manta, Michail Sarafidis, Winfried Schlee, Birgit Mazurek, George K Matsopoulos, Dimitrios D Koutsouris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ourania MantaBiomedical Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2071-1144
Michail SarafidisBiomedical Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1921-6525
Winfried SchleeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7942-1788
Birgit MazurekTinnitus Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9587-6632
George K MatsopoulosBiomedical Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2600-9914
Dimitrios D KoutsourisBiomedical Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1205-9918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus is a highly prevalent condition, affecting more than 1 in 7 adults in the EU and causing negative effects on sufferers' quality of life. In this study, we utilised data collected within the "UNITI" project, the largest EU tinnitus-related research programme. Initially, we extracted characteristics from both auditory brainstem response (ABR) and auditory middle latency response (AMLR) signals, which were derived from tinnitus patients. We then combined these features with the patients' clinical data, and integrated them to build machine learning models for the classification of individuals and their ears according to their level of tinnitus-related distress. Several models were developed and tested on different datasets to determine the most relevant features and achieve high performances. Specifically, seven widely used classifiers were utilised on all generated datasets: random forest (RF), linear, radial, and polynomial support vector machines (SVM), naive bayes (NB), neural networks (NN), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Results showed that features extracted from the wavelet-scattering transformed AMLR signals were the most informative data. In combination with the 15 LASSO-selected clinical features, the SVM classifier achieved optimal performance with an AUC value, sensitivity, and specificity of 92.53%, 84.84%, and 83.04%, respectively, indicating high discrimination performance between the two groups.

Indexed as

auditory brainstem responseauditory evoked potentialauditory middle latency responseclassification modellingmachine learningtinnitustinnitus handicap inventorytinnitus-related distresswavelet scattering transform

Identifiers

PMID37298037
PMCPMC10253417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.