Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297962›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis.

Willemina A van Veldhuizen, Hylke van der Wel, Hennie Y Kuipers, Joep Kraeima, Kaj Ten Duis, Jelmer M Wolterink, Jean-Paul P M de Vries, Richte C L Schuurmann, Frank F A IJpma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pre-contoured Plate Fit Assessment for Acetabular Fractures.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Automatic virtual reconstruction of acetabular fractures using a statistical shape model.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Willemina A van VeldhuizenDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7295-9005
Hylke van der WelDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/3D Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hennie Y KuipersDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joep KraeimaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/3D Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8527-960X
Kaj Ten DuisDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jelmer M WolterinkDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Technical Medical Centre, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jean-Paul P M de VriesDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2669-320X
Richte C L SchuurmannDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-3939
Frank F A IJpmaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-2732
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge about anatomical shape variations in the pelvis is mandatory for selection, fitting, positioning, and fixation in pelvic surgery. The current knowledge on pelvic shape variation mostly relies on point-to-point measurements on 2D X-ray images and computed tomography (CT) slices. Three-dimensional region-specific assessments of pelvic morphology are scarce. Our aim was to develop a statistical shape model of the hemipelvis to assess anatomical shape variations in the hemipelvis. CT scans of 200 patients (100 male and 100 female) were used to obtain segmentations. An iterative closest point algorithm was performed to register these 3D segmentations, so a principal component analysis (PCA) could be performed, and a statistical shape model (SSM) of the hemipelvis was developed. The first 15 principal components (PCs) described 90% of the total shape variation, and the reconstruction ability of this SSM resulted in a root mean square error of 1.58 (95% CI: 1.53-1.63) mm. In summary, an SSM of the hemipelvis was developed, which describes the shape variations in a Caucasian population and is able to reconstruct an aberrant hemipelvis. Principal component analyses demonstrated that, in a general population, anatomical shape variations were mostly related to differences in the size of the pelvis (e.g., PC1 describes 68% of the total shape variation, which is attributed to size). Differences between the male and female pelvis were most pronounced in the iliac wing and pubic rami regions. These regions are often subject to injuries. Future clinical applications of our newly developed SSM may be relevant for SSM-based semi-automatic virtual reconstruction of a fractured hemipelvis as part of preoperative planning. Lastly, for companies, using our SSM might be interesting in order to assess which sizes of pelvic implants should be produced to provide proper-fitting implants for most of the population.

Indexed as

3D geometrical modelosteosynthesispelvic fracturepelvisprincipal component analysisstatistical shape modeling

Identifiers

PMID37297962
PMCPMC10253964
OpenAlexW4378903502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.