Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297960›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Trends and Obstacles to Implement Dynamic Perfusion Concepts for Clinical Liver Transplantation: Results from a Global Web-Based Survey.

Alessandro Parente, Mauricio Flores Carvalho, Rebecca Panconesi, Yuri L Boteon, Riccardo De Carlis, Philipp Dutkowski, Paolo Muiesan, Daniele Dondossola, Andrea Schlegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessandro ParenteHPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5506-224X
Mauricio Flores CarvalhoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Rebecca PanconesiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Yuri L BoteonLiver Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo 05652-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1709-9284
Riccardo De CarlisDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3697-1653
Philipp DutkowskiDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Paolo MuiesanDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Daniele DondossolaFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Center of Preclinical Research, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4374-3184
Andrea SchlegelDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrgan perfusion technology is increasingly used in many countries, with a focus, however, on the Western world. This study investigates the current international trends and obstacles to the broader routine implementation of dynamic perfusion concepts in liver transplantation.

methodsA web-based anonymous survey was launched in 2021. Experts of all involved specializations from 70 centers in 34 countries were contacted, based on the published literature and experience in the field of abdominal organ perfusion.

resultsOverall, 143 participants from 23 countries completed the survey. Most respondents were male (67.8%) and transplant surgeons (64.3%) working at university hospitals (67.9%). The majority had experience with organ perfusion (82%), applying mainly hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP; 38%) and other concepts. While most (94.4%) expect a higher utilization of marginal organs with machine perfusion, the majority considers HMP the best technique to reduce liver discard-rates. While most respondents (90%) believed machine perfusion should be fully commissioned, the lack of funding (34%) and knowledge (16%) as well as limited staff (19%) were the three main obstacles to a routine clinical implementation.

conclusionAlthough dynamic preservation concepts are increasingly used in clinical practice, significant challenges remain. Specific financial pathways, uniform regulations, and tight collaborations among involved experts are needed to achieve wider global clinical use.

Indexed as

dynamic organ preservationliver transplantationorgan perfusionsurvey

Identifiers

PMID37297960
PMCPMC10253826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.