Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297949›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Stroke: A Narrative Review of United States Food and Drug Administration-Approved Technologies.

Anirudha S Chandrabhatla, Elyse A Kuo, Jennifer D Sokolowski, Ryan T Kellogg, Min Park, Panagiotis Mastorakos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anirudha S ChandrabhatlaSchool of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Elyse A KuoSchool of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7064-1485
Jennifer D SokolowskiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Ryan T KelloggDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6491-5443
Min ParkDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Panagiotis MastorakosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is an emergency in which delays in treatment can lead to significant loss of neurological function and be fatal. Technologies that increase the speed and accuracy of stroke diagnosis or assist in post-stroke rehabilitation can improve patient outcomes. No resource exists that comprehensively assesses artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled technologies indicated for the management of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. We queried a United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database, along with PubMed and private company websites, to identify the recent literature assessing the clinical performance of FDA-approved AI/ML-enabled technologies. The FDA has approved 22 AI/ML-enabled technologies that triage brain imaging for more immediate diagnosis or promote post-stroke neurological/functional recovery. Technologies that assist with diagnosis predominantly use convolutional neural networks to identify abnormal brain images (e.g., CT perfusion). These technologies perform comparably to neuroradiologists, improve clinical workflows (e.g., time from scan acquisition to reading), and improve patient outcomes (e.g., days spent in the neurological ICU). Two devices are indicated for post-stroke rehabilitation by leveraging neuromodulation techniques. Multiple FDA-approved technologies exist that can help clinicians better diagnose and manage stroke. This review summarizes the most up-to-date literature regarding the functionality, performance, and utility of these technologies so clinicians can make informed decisions when using them in practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceFDAintracerebral hemorrhagemachine learningstroke

Identifiers

PMID37297949
PMCPMC10253618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.