Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297925›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

The Current Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Nonmetastatic Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Megan Ngai, Thenappan Chandrasekar, Gennady Bratslavsky, Hanan Goldberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07321197 (Template Lymph Node Dissection for Tumor Control in High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07321197 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Template Lymph Node Dissection for Tumor Control in High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTianjin Medical University Second HospitalRan2025 to 2033Enrolled220ConditionsRenal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer)ArmsTemplate Lymph Node Dissection, Selective Lymph Node Resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan NgaiUrology Department, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Thenappan ChandrasekarDepartment of Urology, University of California, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
Gennady BratslavskyUrology Department, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2712-4375
Hanan GoldbergUrology Department, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5777-2138
SUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the current role of lymph node dissection (LND) in the management of nonmetastatic localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

backgroundThere is currently no proven benefit of LND in the setting of RCC, and its role remains controversial because of conflicting evidence. Patients who may benefit from LND are those at greatest risk of nodal disease, but the tools used to predict nodal involvement are limited due to unpredictable retroperitoneal lymphatics. The indications, templates, and extent of LND are also not standardized, adding to the ambiguity of current guidelines surrounding its use. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A PubMed search of the literature from January 2017 to December 2022 was conducted using the search terms "renal cell carcinoma" or "renal cancer" in combination with "lymph node dissection" or "lymphadenectomy". Case studies and editorials were excluded, whereas studies investigating the therapeutic effect of LND were classified as either demonstrating a benefit or no benefit. References of the studies and review articles were also searched for notable studies and findings that were outside the five-year literature search. The studies in this review were restricted to the English language.

resultsOnly a number of studies in recent years have found an association between the extent of LND and increased survival. Most studies do not indicate an associated benefit, and some even suggest a negative effect on survival. Most of these studies are retrospective.

conclusionThe therapeutic value of LND in RCC is still unclear, and although prospective data are needed, its declining rates and emerging new therapies make this unlikely. A better understanding of renal lymphatics and improved detection of nodal disease may help determine the role of LND in nonmetastatic localized RCC.

Indexed as

kidney cancerlymph node dissectionrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37297925
PMCPMC10253302
OpenAlexW4378651776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.