Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297886›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Benefits of Prehabilitation before Complex Aortic Surgery.

Thomas Mesnard, Maxime Dubosq, Louis Pruvot, Richard Azzaoui, Benjamin O Patterson, Jonathan Sobocinski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas MesnardService de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Centre de l'Aorte, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
Maxime DubosqService de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Centre de l'Aorte, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5457-8807
Louis PruvotService de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Centre de l'Aorte, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
Richard AzzaouiService de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Centre de l'Aorte, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
Benjamin O PattersonDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Jonathan SobocinskiService de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Centre de l'Aorte, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2926-9225
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRInserm · FRUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this narrative review was to detail and discuss the underlying principles and benefits of preoperative interventions addressing risk factors for perioperative adverse events in open aortic surgery (OAS). The term "complex aortic disease" encompasses juxta/pararenal aortic and thoraco-abdominal aneurysms, chronic aortic dissection and occlusive aorto-iliac pathology. Although endovascular surgery has been increasingly favored, OAS remains a durable option, but by necessity involves extensive surgical approaches and aortic cross-clamping and requires a trained multidisciplinary team. The physiological stress of OAS in a fragile and comorbid patient group mandates thoughtful preoperative risk assessment and the implementation of measures dedicated to improving outcomes. Cardiac and pulmonary complications are one of the most frequent adverse events following major OAS and their incidences are correlated to the patient's functional status and previous comorbidities. Prehabilitation should be considered in patients with risk factors for pulmonary complications including advanced age, previous chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure with the aid of pulmonary function tests. It should also be combined with other measures to improve postoperative course and be included in the more general concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Although the current level of evidence regarding the effectiveness of ERAS in the setting of OAS remains low, an increasing body of literature has promoted its implementation in other specialties. Consequently, vascular teams should commit to improving the current evidence through studies to make ERAS the standard of care for OAS.

Indexed as

enhanced recovery after surgeryopen aortic repairprehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37297886
PMCPMC10253497
OpenAlexW4378528138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.