ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06254352 (Evaluation of Clinical Risk Scores in Prediction of Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Non Cirrhotic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Clinical Risk Scores in Prediction of Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Non Cirrhotic Patients
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of antithrombotic therapy on management and prognosis of patients hospitalized for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors and therapeutic yield of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in critically and morbidly ill patients presenting with coffee-ground vomitus.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Triage for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department: a comparison of risk scoring systems.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of BUN-Based Ratios for Mortality and Prolonged Hospitalization in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison with Established Risk Scores.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Comparative predictive value of AIMS65, Pre-endoscopic Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring Systems in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of the Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio in Acute Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) and Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI) as Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pyroptosis-immunity-microbiome axis in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: mechanisms, risk prediction, and individualized strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Focus on Blood Urea Nitrogen-Based Ratios and Age-Adjusted Shock Index.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
- Stress hyperglycemia ratio predicts adverse outcomes in emergency department patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.PloS one · 2026Article
- The role of shock indexes and RDW/albumin ratio in upper gastrointestinal bleeding : Predicting adverse outcomes.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict hemostatic intervention in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Impact of Timing of Endoscopy on Mortality in Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study :.Galen medical journal · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for new-onset gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Article
- Upper gastrointestinal bleeding differences between older and younger adults: should bleeding in non-cirrhotic patients be considered a geriatric syndrome?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Predictive Utility of Pre- and Post-Endoscopic Risk Scores and Hemodynamic Indexes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Urgent Versus Early Endoscopy on Outcomes in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Study.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Four Scoring Systems for Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency. Thorough initial assessment and appropriate resuscitation are essential to stabilise the patient. Risk scores provide an important tool to discriminate between lower- and higher-risk patients. Very low-risk patients can be safely discharged for out-patient management, while higher-risk patients can receive appropriate in-patient care. The Glasgow Blatchford Score, with a score of 0-1, performs best in the identification of very low-risk patients who will not require hospital based intervention or die, and is recommended by most guidelines to facilitate safe out-patient management. The performance of risk scores in the identification of specific adverse events to define high-risk patients is less accurate, with no individual score performing consistently well. Ongoing developments in the use of machine learning models and artificial intelligence in predicting poor outcomes in UGIB appear promising and will likely form the basis of dynamic risk assessment in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.