Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297791›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

EASY-NET Program: Methods and Preliminary Results of an Audit and Feedback Intervention in the Emergency Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Lazio Region, Italy.

Laura Angelici, Carmen Angioletti, Luigi Pinnarelli, Paola Colais, Egidio de Mattia, Nera Agabiti, Marina Davoli, Anna Acampora

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura AngeliciDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service-Lazio, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00147 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3731-1606
Carmen AngiolettiManagement and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management, Department Embeds, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Luigi PinnarelliDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service-Lazio, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00147 Rome, Italy.
Paola ColaisDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service-Lazio, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00147 Rome, Italy.
Egidio de MattiaCritical Pathways and Evaluation Outcome Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli"-IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Nera AgabitiDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service-Lazio, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00147 Rome, Italy.
Marina DavoliDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service-Lazio, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00147 Rome, Italy.
Anna AcamporaDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service-Lazio, Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112, 00147 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5363-403X
Agenzia Regionale Parchi · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

Ministry of Health Italy NET-2016-02364191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the EASY-NET network program (NET-2016-02364191), Work Package 1 Lazio evaluates the effectiveness of a structured audit and feedback (A&F) intervention compared with the web-based regional periodic publication of indicators in improving the appropriateness and timeliness of emergency healthcare for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This work describes the A&F methodology and presents the results of the first feedback delivered. The intervention involves sending periodic reports via e-mail to participating hospitals. The feedback reports include a set of volume and quality (process and outcome) indicators, calculated by facility through the health information system of the Lazio Region and compared with regional mean, target values and values calculated for hospitals with similar volumes of activity. Health managers and clinicians of each participating hospital represent the "feedback recipients". They are invited to organize clinical and organizational audit meetings to identify possible critical issues in the care pathway and define, where necessary, improvement actions. A total of 16 facilities are involved. Twelve facilities present high volumes in all volume indicators, while three facilities present low volumes for each indicator. Concerning the quality indicators, four facilities do not present critical indicators or had average results, three facilities do not present critical indicators but show average results in at least one of the indicators and six facilities present a critical value for at least one of the indicators. The first report highlighted some critical issues in some facilities on several indicators. During the audit meetings, each facility analyzes these issues, defining appropriate improvement actions. The outcome of these actions will be monitored through subsequent reporting to support the continuous care quality improvement process.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionaudit and feedbackemergency

Identifiers

PMID37297791
PMCPMC10252972
OpenAlexW4379384986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.