Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297766›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Teledermatology Evaluation and Feedback Systems: A Tool for Improving Care.

José Luis Gatica, Diego Aragón-Caqueo, Gabriel Aedo, Héctor Fuenzalida, Rodrigo Loubies, Sócrates Aedo, María Francisca Carrasco, Vezna Sabando, Carolina Cunill, María José Letelier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

José Luis GaticaHospital Digital, Célula de Teledermatología, Ministerio de Salud de Chile, Santiago 8320218, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2246-7221
Diego Aragón-CaqueoEscuela de Medicina, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica 1000000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-960X
Gabriel AedoFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Héctor FuenzalidaFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Rodrigo LoubiesFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Sócrates AedoEscuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago 7501015, Chile.
María Francisca CarrascoHospital Digital, Célula de Teledermatología, Ministerio de Salud de Chile, Santiago 8320218, Chile.
Vezna SabandoHospital Digital, Célula de Teledermatología, Ministerio de Salud de Chile, Santiago 8320218, Chile.
Carolina CunillHospital Digital, Célula de Teledermatología, Ministerio de Salud de Chile, Santiago 8320218, Chile.
María José LetelierHospital Digital, Célula de Teledermatología, Ministerio de Salud de Chile, Santiago 8320218, Chile.
Ministry of Health · CLUniversidad de Santiago de Chile · CLFinis Terrae University · CLUniversity of Tarapacá · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chile is a country where teledermatology has been growing exponentially since the implementation of a single national asynchronous teledermatology platform for the public system in December 2018. To ensure the quality of care in teledermatology systems, it is crucial to evaluate the fulfillment of basic specifiers such as ICD-Diagnosis, therapeutic suggestions, and diagnostic suggestions, among others. This article aims to evaluate the teledermatology system of the Chilean public health service by analyzing 243 randomly extracted consultations, representative of the 20,716 electronic consultations performed during 2020. Compliance with basic specifiers is evaluated. From these, fulfillment of core teledermatology functions, such as diagnostic and therapeutic suggestions, is observed in most consultations. There are statistically significant relationships between the patient's destination (primary health center [PHC] or face-to-face referral), pharmacological prescription, coverage of the drug prescribed by the public system, and the education received by the consulting physician. If the consultation is resolved in the PHC, there is a higher chance for pharmacological prescription, prescribing mostly drugs that are covered by the government. This is less likely to occur when patients are referred for face-to-face evaluation. A targeted evaluation of education, pharmacological prescriptions, and their applicability is key to improving the quality of teledermatology systems.

Indexed as

feedback systemsinformation systemsquality of careteledermatology

Identifiers

PMID37297766
PMCPMC10252681
OpenAlexW4379230752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.