Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297593›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

The COVID Psychosocial Impacts Scale: A Reliable and Valid Tool to Examine the Psychosocial Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Sandila Tanveer, Philip J Schluter, Ben Beaglehole, Richard J Porter, Joseph Boden, Ruqayya Sulaiman-Hill, Damian Scarf, Shaystah Dean, Fatima Assad, Mahammad Abul Hasnat and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05052333 (An International Study Examining the Psychosocial Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05052333 completednot on this map

An International Study Examining the Psychosocial Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of OtagoRan2021 to 2023Enrolled2,574ConditionsPsychosocial Impacts, COVID-19 Pandemic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sandila TanveerDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0648-5382
Philip J SchluterTe Kaupeka Oranga|Faculty of Health, Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha|University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-6779
Ben BeagleholeDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-1745
Richard J PorterDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
Joseph BodenDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
Ruqayya Sulaiman-HillDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0650-1618
Damian ScarfDepartment of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9486-8059
Shaystah DeanDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Wellington Campus, University of Otago, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.
Fatima AssadDepartment of Psychiatry, HITEC Institute of Medical Sciences, Taxila 47078, Pakistan.
Mahammad Abul HasnatDepartment of Education, Milestone College, Dhaka 1230, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-8412-5649
Caroline BellDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch Campus, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports on the development and validation of the COVID Psychosocial Impacts Scale (CPIS), a self-report measure that comprehensively examines both positive and negative psychosocial impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. This is the first part of the program of work in which the CPIS was administered and compared with a measure of psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K-10) and wellbeing (World Health Organization Well-Being Index, WHO-5). The data were obtained online in 2020 and 2022 at two distinct time points to capture different exposures to the pandemic in the New Zealand population to a non-representative sample of 663 and 687 adults, respectively. Two hundred seventy-one participants took part in both surveys. Findings indicate a unidimensional structure within CPIS subscales and inter-relatedness among CPIS stress-related subscales. The scatter plots and correlation matrix indicate CPIS having a positive moderate correlation with K10 and a negative moderate correlation with WHO-5, indicative of construct validity. The paper outlines contextual factors surrounding CPIS development and makes suggestions for future iterations of CPIS. Further work will examine its psychometric properties across cultures.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultHumansPandemicsSelf ReportStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19psychological distresspsychosocial impactsreliabilityvaliditywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37297593
PMCPMC10252202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.