Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297557›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

"I Don't Want to Go to Work": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Healthcare Worker Experiences from the Front- and Side-Lines of COVID-19.

Smith F Heavner, Mackenzie Stuenkel, Rebecca Russ Sellers, Rhiannon McCallus, Kendall D Dean, Chloe Wilson, Marissa Shuffler, Thomas W Britt, Shannon Stark Taylor, Molly Benedum and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Smith F HeavnerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Mackenzie StuenkelDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Rebecca Russ SellersPremier Neuro, Greer, SC 29650, USA.
Rhiannon McCallusDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Kendall D DeanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.
Chloe WilsonDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Marissa ShufflerDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Thomas W BrittDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Shannon Stark TaylorCenter for Family Medicine, Department of Medicine, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4830-2852
Molly BenedumAppFamily Medicine, Department of Medicine, Appalachian Regional Healthcare System, Boone, NC 28607, USA.
Niki MunkDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Health & Human Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Rachel MayoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Kathleen Buford CartmellDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Sarah GriffinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Ann Blair KennedyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3518-6314
Clemson University · USUniversity of South Carolina · USAppalachian Regional Healthcare · USIndiana University Health · USPrisma Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCW) were categorized as "essential" and "non-essential", creating a division where some were "locked-in" a system with little ability to prepare for or control the oncoming crisis. Others were "locked-out" regardless of whether their skills might be useful. The purpose of this study was to systematically gather data over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic from HCW through an interprofessional lens to examine experiences of locked-out HCW. This convergent parallel mixed-methods study captured perspectives representing nearly two dozen professions through a survey, administered via social media, and video blogs. Analysis included logistic regression models of differences in outcome measures by professional category and Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio recordings (RITA) of video blogs. We collected 1299 baseline responses from 15 April 2020 to 16 March 2021. Of those responses, 12.1% reported no signs of burnout, while 21.9% reported four or more signs. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) professional identity, (2) intrinsic stressors, (3) extrinsic factors, and (4) coping strategies. There are some differences in the experiences of locked-in and locked-out HCW. This did not always lead to differing reports of moral distress and burnout, and both groups struggled to cope with the realities of the pandemic.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19Adaptation, PsychologicalBloggingHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsburnouthealthcare workermassage therapistmoral distressnurse

Identifiers

PMID37297557
PMCPMC10252235
OpenAlexW4378471635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.