Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297542›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Factors Associated with the Level of Knowledge about Biosafety against COVID-19 in Peruvian Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study under a Multivariable Regression Model.

John Santome-Pariona, Gissela Briceño-Vergel, Nancy Córdova-Limaylla, Marysela Ladera-Castañeda, José Huamani-Echaccaya, Rita Tolmos-Valdivia, Juan Huamani-Cantoral, Fredy Solís-Dante, Luis Cervantes-Ganoza, César Cayo-Rojas

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John Santome-ParionaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica 11002, Peru.
Gissela Briceño-VergelSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica 11002, Peru.
Nancy Córdova-LimayllaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica 11002, Peru.
Marysela Ladera-CastañedaResearch Team "Salud Pública-Salud Integral", Faculty of Dentistry and Postgraduate School, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima 15001, Peru.
José Huamani-EchaccayaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica 11002, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-0261-2049
Rita Tolmos-ValdiviaSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica 11002, Peru.
Juan Huamani-CantoralSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica 11002, Peru.
Fredy Solís-DanteFaculdade Do Centro Oeste Paulista, Bauru 17012, Brazil.
Luis Cervantes-GanozaFaculty of Stomatology, Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Lima 15084, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-6090-6750
César Cayo-RojasSchool of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Ica 11002, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-5560-7841
Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista · PEFederico Villarreal National University · PEUniversidade do Oeste Paulista · BRUniversidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimBiosafety is a set of preventive measures aimed at controlling risk factors arising from biological, physical, and/or chemical agents. This topic is particularly important in the dental field since saliva is the main biological agent of the transmission of coronavirus. The present study aimed to determine the factors associated with the level of knowledge about biosafety against COVID-19 in Peruvian dentistry students. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present observational, cross-sectional, and analytical study evaluated 312 Peruvian dentistry students. A validated 20-question questionnaire was used to measure the level of knowledge. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare levels of knowledge between categories of each variable. A logit model was used to evaluate associated factors such as sex, age, marital status, place of origin, academic year of study, being in the academic upper third, history of COVID-19, and living with vulnerable family members. A significance level of

results36.2%, 31.4%, and 32.4% presented poor, fair, and good knowledge levels, respectively. Students under 25 years of age were 64% less likely to pass the biosafety against COVID-19 questionnaire than students 25 years of age and older (OR = 0.36; CI: 0.20-0.66). Students in the academic upper third were nine times more likely to pass the test than other students (OR = 9.38; CI: 4.61-19.07). Finally, third-year students were 52% less likely to pass the exam than fifth-year students (OR = 0.48; CI: 0.28-0.83).

conclusionOnly a minority of dentistry students had a good level of knowledge about biosafety against COVID-19. Younger and less educated students were more likely to fail the questionnaire. On the other hand, those students with outstanding academic performance were more likely to pass the questionnaire.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultContainment of BiohazardsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPeruStudents, DentalYoung Adultbiosafety against COVID-19dentistryinfection controlpersonal protective equipmentrisk of contagion

Identifiers

PMID37297542
PMCPMC10252526
OpenAlexW4378228377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.