Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297533›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Diabetic Foot Assessment and Care: Barriers and Facilitators in a Cross-Sectional Study in Bangalore, India.

Sudha B G, Umadevi V, Joshi Manisha Shivaram, Pavan Belehalli, Shekar M A, Chaluvanarayana H C, Mohamed Yacin Sikkandar, Marcos Leal Brioschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of Digital Intervention on Nurses' Knowledge About Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Quasi-Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Knowledge, attitudes and practices on diabetic foot care among nurses in Kimberley, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sudha B GDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bangalore 560019, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6361-6836
Umadevi VDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bangalore 560019, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5265-3925
Joshi Manisha ShivaramDepartment of Medical Electronics, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bangalore 560019, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5115-1923
Pavan BelehalliDepartment of Podiatry, Karnataka Institute of Endocrinology and Research, Bangalore 560019, India.
Shekar M ADepartment of Podiatry, Karnataka Institute of Endocrinology and Research, Bangalore 560019, India.
Chaluvanarayana H CDepartment of Podiatry, Karnataka Institute of Endocrinology and Research, Bangalore 560019, India.
Mohamed Yacin SikkandarMedical Equipment Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7971-1504
Marcos Leal BrioschiMedical Thermography Service, Neurology Department, Hospital das Clínicas, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4822-8314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: This cross-sectional study aims to highlight the assessment and foot care practices in an advanced clinical setting, the clinical characteristics of the patients, and to understand the barriers and facilitators for effective foot care from the perspectives of healthcare practices, resources, and patients' socioeconomic and cultural practices, and other aspects in terms of new technologies for effective foot care such as infrared thermography. (2) Methods: Clinical test data from 158 diabetic patients and a questionnaire to assess the foot care education retention rate were collected at the Karnataka Institute of Endocrinology and Research (KIER) facility. (3) Results: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) were found in 6% of the examined individuals. Male patients were more likely to have diabetes complications, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.18 (CI = 0.49-2.84). Other diabetes problems raised the likelihood of DFUs by OR 5 (CI = 1.40-17.77). The constraints include socioeconomic position, employment conditions, religious customs, time and cost, and medication non-adherence. The attitude of podiatrists and nurses, diabetic foot education, and awareness protocols and amenities at the facility were all facilitators. (4) Conclusions: Most diabetic foot complications might be avoided with foot care education, regular foot assessments as the standard of treatment, and self-care as a preventive/therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootCross-Sectional StudiesFootHumansIndiaMaleSelf Carebarriersdiabetic foot assessmentfacilitatorsfoot care educationfoot care practicesfoot complications epidemiologythermography

Identifiers

PMID37297533
PMCPMC10252617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.