ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Modeling Elastomer Compression: Exploring Ten Constitutive Equations.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents the results of research aimed at assessing the effectiveness of ten selected constitutive equations for hyperelastic bodies in numerical modeling of the first compression load cycle of a polyurethane elastomer with a hardness of 90 Sh A depending on the methodology for determining the material constants in the constitutive equations. An analysis was carried out for four variants for determining the constants in the constitutive equations. In three variants, the material constants were determined on the basis of a single material test, i.e., the most popular and available in engineering practice, the uniaxial tensile test (variant I), the biaxial tensile test (variant II) and the tensile test in a plane strain (variant III). In variant IV, the constants in the constitutive equations were determined on the basis of all three above material tests. The accuracy of the obtained results was verified experimentally. It has been shown that, in the case of variant I, the modeling results depend to the greatest extent on the type of constitutive equation used. Therefore, in this case it is very important to choose the right equation. Taking into account all the investigated constitutive equations, the second variant for determining the material constants turned out to be the most advantageous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.