Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296946›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

CT and MR Imaging of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Practical Guide for the Radiologist.

Giorgia Porrello, Roberto Cannella, Angelo Randazzo, Giuseppe Badalamenti, Giuseppe Brancatelli, Federica Vernuccio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Liver metastases: The role of magnetic resonance imaging.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgia PorrelloSection of Radiology, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnosis (Bi.N.D), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1617-5609
Roberto CannellaSection of Radiology, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnosis (Bi.N.D), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3808-0785
Angelo RandazzoDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale, 92100 Agrigento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-5248
Giuseppe BadalamentiSection of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences (DICHIRONS), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2478-8838
Giuseppe BrancatelliSection of Radiology, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnosis (Bi.N.D), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Federica VernuccioDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0350-1794
University of Palermo · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent around 10-16% of all sarcomas, with liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas being the most common subtypes. RPS have some peculiar characteristics, imaging appearances, worse prognosis, and complications compared to other locations of sarcoma. Commonly, RPS primarily present as large masses, progressively encasing adjacent structures, causing mass effect, and complications. RPS diagnosis is often challenging, and these tumors may be overlooked; however, failure to recognize RPS characteristics leads to a worse prognosis for the patients. Surgery is the only recognized curative treatment, but the anatomical constraints of the retroperitoneum limit the ability to achieve wide resection margins; therefore, these tumors have a high rate of recurrence, and require long-term follow-up. The radiologist has an important role in the diagnosis of RPS, the definition of their extent, and their follow-up. Specific knowledge of the main imaging findings is required to reach an early diagnosis, and, ultimately, to guarantee the best patient management. This article provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding cross-sectional imaging features of patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, presenting tips and tricks to improve imaging diagnosis of RPS.

Indexed as

complicationscomputed tomographydifferential diagnosisleiomyomaliposarcomamagnetic resonance imagingnerve sheath tumorretroperitoneal neoplasmssarcomasolitary fibrous tumor

Identifiers

PMID37296946
PMCPMC10252049
OpenAlexW4378908353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.