Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296930›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Standardization of Body Composition Status in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Tumors: The Role of a CT-Based AI-Powered Software for the Assessment of Sarcopenia and Patient Outcome Correlation.

Antonella Borrelli, Martina Pecoraro, Francesco Del Giudice, Leonardo Cristofani, Emanuele Messina, Ailin Dehghanpour, Nicholas Landini, Michela Roberto, Stefano Perotti, Maurizio Muscaritoli and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonella BorrelliDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Martina PecoraroDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3865-5988
Leonardo CristofaniDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Emanuele MessinaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Ailin DehghanpourDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Nicholas LandiniDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2928-3003
Michela RobertoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5339-8348
Stefano PerottiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Maurizio MuscaritoliDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Daniele SantiniDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Carlo CatalanoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Valeria PanebiancoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia is a well know prognostic factor in oncology, influencing patients' quality of life and survival. We aimed to investigate the role of sarcopenia, assessed by a Computed Tomography (CT)-based artificial intelligence (AI)-powered-software, as a predictor of objective clinical benefit in advanced urothelial tumors and its correlations with oncological outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively searched patients with advanced urothelial tumors, treated with systemic platinum-based chemotherapy and an available total body CT, performed before and after therapy. An AI-powered software was applied to CT to obtain the Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI-L3), derived from the area of the psoas, long spine, and abdominal muscles, at the level of L3 on CT axial images. Logistic and Cox-regression modeling was implemented to explore the association of sarcopenic status and anthropometric features to the clinical benefit rate and survival endpoints.

results97 patients were included, 66 with bladder cancer and 31 with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Clinical benefit outcomes showed a linear positive association with all the observed body composition variables variations. The chances of not experiencing disease progression were positively associated with ∆_SMI-L3, ∆_psoas, and ∆_long spine muscle when they ranged from ~10-20% up to ~45-55%. Greater survival chances were matched by patients achieving a wider ∆_SMI-L3, ∆_abdominal and ∆_long spine muscle.

conclusionsA CT-based AI-powered software body composition and sarcopenia analysis provide prognostic assessments for objective clinical benefits and oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence softwareComputed TomographyOncologySarcopeniaUrogenital Tumors

Identifiers

PMID37296930
PMCPMC10251974
OpenAlexW4378713599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.