Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296924›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Treating Primary Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review of Available Treatment Options.

Lotte G Zuur, Hilda A de Barros, Koen J C van der Mijn, André N Vis, Andries M Bergman, Floris J Pos, Jeroen A van Moorselaar, Henk G van der Poel, Wouter V Vogel, Pim J van Leeuwen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lotte G ZuurDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hilda A de BarrosDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Koen J C van der MijnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
André N VisDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andries M BergmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-2549
Floris J PosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen A van MoorselaarDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter V VogelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim J van LeeuwenDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with a primary diagnosis of clinically and pathologically node-positive (cN1M0 and pN1M0) hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa). The treatment paradigm has shifted as research has shown that these patients could benefit from intensified treatment and are potentially curable. This scoping review provides an overview of available treatments for men with primary-diagnosed cN1M0 and pN1M0 PCa. A search was conducted on Medline for studies published between 2002 and 2022 that reported on treatment and outcomes among patients with cN1M0 and pN1M0 PCa. In total, twenty-seven eligible articles were included in this analysis: six randomised controlled trials, one systematic review, and twenty retrospective/observational studies. For cN1M0 PCa patients, the best-established treatment option is a combination of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) applied to both the prostate and lymph nodes. Based on most recent studies, treatment intensification can be beneficial, but more randomised studies are needed. For pN1M0 PCa patients, adjuvant or early salvage treatments based on risk stratification determined by factors such as Gleason score, tumour stage, number of positive lymph nodes, and surgical margins appear to be the best-established treatment options. These treatments include close monitoring and adjuvant treatment with ADT and/or EBRT.

Indexed as

androgen deprivation therapymetastasisnode-positiveprimary diagnosedprostate cancerradical prostatectomyradiotherapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID37296924
PMCPMC10251924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.