Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296913›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Assessing the Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Bladder Cancer: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.

Mara Bacchiani, Vincenzo Salamone, Eleana Massaro, Alessandro Sandulli, Riccardo Mariottini, Anna Cadenar, Fabrizio Di Maida, Benjamin Pradere, Laura S Mertens, Mattia Longoni and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Diagnostic efficacy of [Discover oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Pre-Hydration and a Forced Diuresis Protocol forJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Mara BacchianiOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9331-2825
Vincenzo SalamoneOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2953-7587
Eleana MassaroOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Alessandro SandulliOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Riccardo MariottiniOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Anna CadenarOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Fabrizio Di MaidaOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, 31000 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7768-8558
Laura S MertensDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mattia LongoniDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2613-2306
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3865-5988
David D'AndreaComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1625-1077
Ekaterina LaukhtinaComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Andrea MinerviniOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.
Marco MoschiniDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Andrea MariOncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9070-5706
On Behalf Of European Association Of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Eau-Yau Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group
University of Florence · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITVienna General Hospital · ATAl-Ahliyya Amman University · JOPoliclinico Umberto I · ITThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLymph node (LN) involvement is a crucial determinant of prognosis for patients with bladder cancer, and an accurate staging is of utmost importance to better identify timely and appropriate therapeutic strategies. To improve the accuracy of LN detection, as an alternative to traditional methods such as CT or MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT has been increasingly used. 18F-FDG PET/CT is also used in post-treatment restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this narrative literature review is to provide an overview of the current evidence on the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis, staging, and restaging of bladder cancer, with a particular focus on its sensitivity and specificity for the detection of LN metastasis. We aim to provide clinicians with a better understanding of 18F-FDG PET/CT's potential benefits and limitations in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe designed a narrative review starting from a wide search in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases, selecting full-text English articles that have examined the sensibility and specificity of PET/CT for nodal staging or restaging after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with bladder cancer. The extracted data were analyzed and synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach. The results are presented in a tabular format, with a summary of the main findings of each study.

resultsTwenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria: fourteen studies evaluated 18F-FDG PET/CT for nodal staging, six studies examined its accuracy for restaging after neoadjuvant therapy, and three studies evaluated both applications. To date, the use of F-18 FDG PET/TC for detection of LN metastasis in bladder cancer is controversial and uncertain: some studies showed low accuracy rates, but over the years other studies have reported evidence of high sensitivity and specificity.

conclusions18F-FDG PET/CT provides important incremental staging and restaging information that can potentially influence clinical management in MIBC patients. Standardization and development of a scoring system are necessary for its wider adoption. Well-designed randomized controlled trials in larger populations are necessary to provide consistent recommendations and consolidate the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of bladder cancer patients.

Indexed as

bladder cancerFDG PET/CTlymph noderestagingstaging

Identifiers

PMID37296913
PMCPMC10252107
OpenAlexW4378619425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.