Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296893›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Hope and Hype around Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Flavia Jacobs, Elisa Agostinetto, Chiara Miggiano, Rita De Sanctis, Alberto Zambelli, Armando Santoro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Implications of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: clinical oncologist perspectives.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Flavia JacobsDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9126-8325
Elisa AgostinettoAcademic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), 1070 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0295-7511
Chiara MiggianoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6580-673X
Rita De SanctisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3202-1933
Alberto ZambelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1374-1831
Armando SantoroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-9492
Humanitas University · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) holds a poor prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes, and the development of new effective treatment strategies is an unmet medical need. TNBC has traditionally been considered not amenable to treatment with targeted agents due to a lack of actionable targets. Therefore, chemotherapy has remained the mainstay of systemic treatment for many decades. The advent of immunotherapy raised very hopeful expectations in TNBC, possibly due to higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden compared to other breast cancer subtypes, that predict an effective anti-tumor immune-engagement. The results of clinical trials testing immunotherapy in TNBC led to the approval of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in both early and advanced settings. However, some open questions about the use of immunotherapy in TNBC still exist. These include a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity of the disease, identification of reliable predictive biomarkers of response, determination of the most appropriate chemotherapy backbone and appropriate management of potential long-term immune-related adverse events. In this review we aim to examine the available evidence on the use of immunotherapy strategies in both early and advanced TNBC, to critically discuss some of the limitations encountered in clinical research and to summarize data on novel promising immunotherapeutic strategies beyond PD-(L)1 blockade that have been investigated in the most recent trials.

Indexed as

immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)immune-related toxicityimmunotherapypredictive biomarkerstriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID37296893
PMCPMC10252021
OpenAlexW4378576198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.