Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Lieke C E PullenBiomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Wyanne A NoortmanBiomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-951X
Lianne TriemstraDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7057-0274
Cas de JonghDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0755-9080
Fenna J RademakerTechMed Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Romy SpijkermanTechMed Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Gijsbert M KalisvaartDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZD Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-3640
Emma C GertsenDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9230-1158
Lioe-Fee de Geus-OeiBiomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1817-2743
Nelleke TolboomDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wobbe O de SteurDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZD Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maura DantumaMulti-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Riemer H J A SlartBiomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5565-1164
Richard van HillegersbergDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jelle P RuurdaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6584-1677
Floris H P van VeldenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZD Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2859-2119
Erik VegtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7456-2258
On Behalf Of The Plastic Study Group
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Twente · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL
Funding
Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 843004103
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
aimTo improve identification of peritoneal and distant metastases in locally advanced gastric cancer using [
methods[
resultsNone of the models could identify metastases with low AUCs of 0.59, 0.51, and 0.56, for the clinical, radiomic, and clinicoradiomic model, respectively. Subgroup analysis of intestinal and mixed-type tumours resulted in low AUCs of 0.67 and 0.60 for the clinical and radiomic models, and a moderate AUC of 0.71 in the clinicoradiomic model. Subgroup analysis of diffuse-type tumours did not improve the classification performance.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Prognostic Value of [ · full record | OpenQuestion