ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Ensemble Learning for Hormone Binding Protein Prediction: A Promising Approach for Early Diagnosis of Thyroid Hormone Disorders in Serum.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based migraine analysis using retinal vessel diameters from optical coherence tomography: an alternative approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Article
- BBB-PEP-prediction: improved computational model for identification of blood-brain barrier peptides using blending position relative composition specific features and ensemble modeling.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- TNFR-LSTM: A Deep Intelligent Model for Identification of Tumour Necroses Factor Receptor (TNFR) Activity.IET systems biologyArticle
- Diaproteo: A supervised learning framework for early detection of diabetes mellitus based on proteomic profiles.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hormone-binding proteins (HBPs) are specific carrier proteins that bind to a given hormone. A soluble carrier hormone binding protein (HBP), which can interact non-covalently and specifically with growth hormone, modulates or inhibits hormone signaling. HBP is essential for the growth of life, despite still being poorly understood. Several diseases, according to some data, are caused by HBPs that express themselves abnormally. Accurate identification of these molecules is the first step in investigating the roles of HBPs and understanding their biological mechanisms. For a better understanding of cell development and cellular mechanisms, accurate HBP determination from a given protein sequence is essential. Using traditional biochemical experiments, it is difficult to correctly separate HBPs from an increasing number of proteins because of the high experimental costs and lengthy experiment periods. The abundance of protein sequence data that has been gathered in the post-genomic era necessitates a computational method that is automated and enables quick and accurate identification of putative HBPs within a large number of candidate proteins. A brand-new machine-learning-based predictor is suggested as the HBP identification method. To produce the desirable feature set for the method proposed, statistical moment-based features and amino acids were combined, and the random forest was used to train the feature set. During 5-fold cross validation experiments, the suggested method achieved 94.37% accuracy and 0.9438 F1-scores, respectively, demonstrating the importance of the Hahn moment-based features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.