ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Validation of a Length-Adjusted Abdominal Arterial Calcium Score Method for Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06956924 (CT-Based Abdominal Aortic Calcium Score and CAD-RADS 2.0 in Elderly Chest Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CT-Based Abdominal Aortic Calcium Score and CAD-RADS 2.0 in Elderly Chest Pain: A Cohort Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abdominal vascular calcification at CT: opportunistic quantification and imaging-based risk stratification.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Abdominal aortic calcification as an opportunistic marker of reduced CT-derived vertebral bone density in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Quantification of abdominal aortic calcification using photon-counting CT angiography: an imaging biomarker for high-risk cardiovascular patients.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Innovative Imaging Techniques: Nice to Have or Essential to Treat Complex Diseases?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Agatston score on noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scans is the gold standard for calcium load determination. However, contrast-enhanced CT is commonly used for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs), such as peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Currently, there is no validated method to determine calcium load in the aorta and peripheral arteries with a contrast-enhanced CT. This study validated a length-adjusted calcium score (LACS) method for contrast-enhanced CT scans.
methodThe LACS (calcium volume in mm
resultsThere was a high correlation between the LACS from contrast-enhanced CT scans and the LACS of noncontrast CTs (
conclusionThe LACS seems to be a robust method for scoring calcium load on contrast-enhanced CT scans in arterial segments with various lengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.