Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296763›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning-A Review.

Maryam Naqvi, Syed Qasim Gilani, Tehreem Syed, Oge Marques, Hee-Cheol Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
32.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maryam NaqviInstitute of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Republic of Korea.
Syed Qasim GilaniDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Tehreem SyedDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Oge MarquesDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4321-2719
Hee-Cheol KimInstitute of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Republic of Korea.
Florida Atlantic University · USInje University · KRTU Dresden · DE

Funding

MSIT(Ministry of Science ICT), Korea, under the National Program for Excellence in SW supervised by the IITP 2022-0-01091, 1711175863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is one the most dangerous types of cancer and is one of the primary causes of death worldwide. The number of deaths can be reduced if skin cancer is diagnosed early. Skin cancer is mostly diagnosed using visual inspection, which is less accurate. Deep-learning-based methods have been proposed to assist dermatologists in the early and accurate diagnosis of skin cancers. This survey reviewed the most recent research articles on skin cancer classification using deep learning methods. We also provided an overview of the most common deep-learning models and datasets used for skin cancer classification.

Indexed as

classificationdeep learningsegmentationskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID37296763
PMCPMC10252190
OpenAlexW4380225220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.