ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A New Hybrid Approach Based on Time Frequency Images and Deep Learning Methods for Diagnosis of Migraine Disease and Investigation of Stimulus Effect.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning Classification of Migraine Using fNIRS During a Postural Task.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Current Trends in Management of Migraine: A Review of Current Practice and Recent Advances.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine is a neurological disorder that is associated with severe headaches and seriously affects the lives of patients. Diagnosing Migraine Disease (MD) can be laborious and time-consuming for specialists. For this reason, systems that can assist specialists in the early diagnosis of MD are important. Although migraine is one of the most common neurological diseases, there are very few studies on the diagnosis of MD, especially electroencephalogram (EEG)-and deep learning (DL)-based studies. For this reason, in this study, a new system has been proposed for the early diagnosis of EEG- and DL-based MD. In the proposed study, EEG signals obtained from the resting state (R), visual stimulus (V), and auditory stimulus (A) from 18 migraine patients and 21 healthy control (HC) groups were used. By applying continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and short-time Fourier transform (STFT) methods to these EEG signals, scalogram-spectrogram images were obtained in the time-frequency (T-F) plane. Then, these images were applied as inputs in three different convolutional neural networks (CNN) architectures (AlexNet, ResNet50, SqueezeNet) that proposed deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) models and classification was performed. The results of the classification process were evaluated, taking into account accuracy (acc.), sensitivity (sens.), specificity (spec.), and performance criteria, and the performances of the preferred methods and models in this study were compared. In this way, the situation, method, and model that showed the most successful performance for the early diagnosis of MD were determined. Although the classification results are close to each other, the resting state, CWT method, and AlexNet classifier showed the most successful performance (Acc: 99.74%, Sens: 99.9%, Spec: 99.52%). We think that the results obtained in this study are promising for the early diagnosis of MD and can be of help to experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.