Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296731›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy as a Novel Method of Caries Detection-An In Vitro Comparative Study in Permanent Teeth.

Jindrich Charvat, Ales Prochazka, Tomas Kucera, Antonin Tichy, Maksim Yurchenko, Lucie Himmlova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jindrich CharvatInstitute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3361-7165
Ales ProchazkaDepartment of Computing and Control Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology in Prague, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0270-1738
Tomas KuceraInstitute of Histology and Embryology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic.
Antonin TichyInstitute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-9992
Maksim YurchenkoInstitute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie HimmlovaInstitute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZCzech Technical University in Prague · CZ

Funding

Charles University Cooperatio 207030 Dental Medicine/LF1Charles University GA UK No. 52220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This in vitro study aimed to compare outcomes of dental caries detection using visual inspection classified according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) with objective assessments using a well-established laser fluorescence system (Diagnodent pen) and a novel diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) device. One hundred extracted permanent premolars and molars were utilized, including sound teeth, teeth with non-cavitated caries, or teeth with small cavitated lesions. A total of 300 regions of interest (ROIs) were assessed using each detection method. Visual inspection, being a subjective method, was performed by two independent examiners. The presence and extent of caries were histologically verified according to Downer's criteria, serving as a reference for other detection methods. Histological results revealed 180 sound ROIs and 120 carious ROIs, categorized into three different extents of caries. Overall, there was no significant difference between the detection methods in sensitivity (0.90-0.93) and false negative rate (0.05-0.07). However, DRS exhibited superior performance in specificity (0.98), accuracy (0.95), and false positive rate (0.04) compared to other detection methods. Although the tested DRS prototype device exhibited limited penetration depth, it shows promise as a method, particularly for the detection of incipient caries.

Indexed as

caries detectionDiagnodent pendiagnosticdiffuse reflectance spectroscopyhistologylaser fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID37296731
PMCPMC10252735
OpenAlexW4378574207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.