Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296431›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2023

Use it or lose it? Identifying reasons for the low use of psychosocial support by hospital staff.

Frank van de Baan, Lieze Poesen, Daan Westra, Bram Fleuren, Dirk Ruwaard, Fred Zijlstra, Rachel Gifford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Slack Is Needed to Solve the Shortage of Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Frank van de Baan *Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands. f.vandebaan@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8085-0245
Lieze Poesen *Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daan WestraDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bram FleurenDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Dirk RuwaardDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Fred ZijlstraDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rachel GiffordDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

ZonMw 10430022010011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychosocial support programs are a way for hospitals to support the mental health of their staff. However, while support is needed, utilization of support by hospital staff remains low. This study aims to identify reasons for non-use and elements that are important to consider when offering psychosocial support.

methodsThis mixed-method, multiple case study used survey data and in-depth interviews to assess the extent of psychosocial support use, reasons for non-use and perceived important elements regarding the offering of psychosocial support among Dutch hospital staff. The study focused on a time of especially high need, namely the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics were used to assess frequency of use among 1514 staff. The constant comparative method was used to analyze answers provided to two open-ended survey questions (n = 274 respondents) and in-depth interviews (n = 37 interviewees).

resultsThe use of psychosocial support decreased from 8.4% in December 2020 to 3.6% by September 2021. We identified four main reasons for non-use of support: deeming support unnecessary, deeming support unsuitable, being unaware of the availability, or feeling undeserving of support. Furthermore, we uncovered four important elements: offer support structurally after the crisis, adjust support to diverse needs, ensure accessibility and awareness, and an active role for supervisors.

conclusionsOur results show that the low use of psychosocial support by hospital staff is shaped by individual, organizational, and support-specific factors. These factors can be targeted to increase use of psychosocial support, whereby it is important to also focus on the wider hospital workforce in addition to frontline staff.

Indexed as

COVID-19HospitalsHumansPandemicsPersonnel, HospitalPsychosocial Support SystemsCrisisHealthcareHealthcare workersMental healthMixed-methodsOrganizational supportWell-being

Identifiers

PMID37296431
PMCPMC10252159
OpenAlexW4380079802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.