Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296350›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2024

Informal care at old age at home and in nursing homes: determinants and economic value.

Quitterie Roquebert, Marianne Tenand

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Quitterie RoquebertUniversité de Strasbourg, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, BETA, 67000, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-9697
Marianne TenandErasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) and the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB), Rotterdam and The Hague, The Netherlands. tenand@eshpm.eur.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4186-1902
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis · NL

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 844314Université de Strasbourg Idex Attractivité - W20 RAT 09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of informal care receipt by the French individuals aged 60 or older. The literature has focused on the community, leaving informal care in residential care settings in the shadow. We leverage data from a representative survey (CARE) conducted in 2015-2016 on both community-dwelling individuals and nursing home residents. Focusing on the 60+ with activity restrictions, we show that 76% of nursing home residents receive help with the activities of daily living from relatives, against 55% in the community. The number of hours conditional on receipt is yet 3.5 times higher in the community. Informal care represents 186 million hours per month and a value equivalent to 1.1% of GDP at least, care in the community representing 95% of the total. We investigate the determinants of informal care receipt. Using an Oaxaca-type approach, we disentangle between two mechanisms explaining that nursing home residents are more likely to receive informal care, namely the differences in population composition (endowments) and the differences in the association of individual characteristics with informal care (coefficients). Both are found to have a similar contribution. Our results imply that private costs make up for the majority (76%) of the costs associated with long-term care provision once informal care is taken into account. They also highlight that informal care is extremely common for nursing home residents. Existing evidence on the determinants of informal care receipt in the community has, however, limited relevance to understand informal care behaviors in nursing homes.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCaregiversHumansIndependent LivingNursing HomesSurveys and QuestionnairesAgingDecompositionInformal careLong-term careValuation

Identifiers

PMID37296350
PMCPMC10972991
OpenAlexW4287534143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.