Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296141›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

Ethnic inequality, multimorbidity and psychosis: can a syndemic framework resolve disputed evidence?

Uzma Zahid, Georgina M Hosang, Daniela Fonseca de Freitas, Roisin Mooney, Kamaldeep Bhui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exploring causal mechanisms of psychosis risk.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Uzma ZahidDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. uzma.zahid@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-4907
Georgina M HosangCentre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Daniela Fonseca de FreitasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8876-4595
Roisin MooneyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kamaldeep BhuiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. kam.bhui@psych.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syndemic theory is described as population-level clustering or co-occurrence of health conditions in the context of shared aetiologies that interact and can act synergistically. These influences appear to act within specific places of high disadvantage. We suggest ethnic inequality in experiences and outcomes of multimorbidity, including psychosis, may be explained through a syndemic framework. We discuss the evidence for each component of syndemic theory in relation to psychosis, using psychosis and diabetes as an exemplar. Following this, we discuss the practical and theoretical adaptations to syndemic theory in order to apply it to psychosis, ethnic inequality and multimorbidity, with implications for research, policy, and practice.

Identifiers

PMID37296141
PMCPMC10256757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.