Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37295806›Full record

Observational studyBMJ global health2023

Lessons learned from implementing the Non-Communicable Diseases Kit in a humanitarian emergency: an operational evaluation in Sudan.

Ahmad Hecham Alani, Laura Miller, Isaac Waweru, Aston B Atwiine, Stella Njagi, Marcello Tonelli, Kelly Kisarach, Abdelrhman Mohammed, Ronald Mugera, Nazik Mohamed Ibrahim and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ahmad Hecham AlaniHealth Technical Unit, International Rescue Committee, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6318-3017
Laura MillerHealth Technical Unit, International Rescue Committee, New York, New York, USA.
Isaac WaweruHealth Technical Unit, International Rescue Committee, Nairobi, Kenya.
Aston B AtwiineHealth Technical Unit, International Rescue Committee, Kampala, Uganda.
Stella NjagiHealth Technical Unit, International Rescue Committee, Nairobi, Kenya Stella.Njagi@rescue.org.
Marcello TonelliDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-3187
Kelly KisarachHealth Technical Unit, International Rescue Committee, Khartoum, Sudan.
Abdelrhman MohammedHealth Technical Unit, International Rescue Committee, Khartoum, Sudan.
Ronald MugeraHealth Technical Unit, International Rescue Committee, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nazik Mohamed IbrahimNCD Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan.
Dina Abdulhammed MohamadPlanning, Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) & Surveillance, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan.
Lilian KiapiHealth Technical Unit/Technical Excellence, International Rescue Committee, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are a major global health concern, and their management is particularly challenging in humanitarian contexts where healthcare resources are limited. The WHO Non-Communicable Diseases Kit (WHO-NCDK) is a health system intervention targeted at the primary healthcare (PHC) level and designed to provide essential medicines and equipment for NCDs management in emergency settings, meeting the needs of 10 000 people for 3 months. This operational evaluation aimed to assess the effectiveness and utility of the WHO-NCDK in two PHC facilities in Sudan and identify key contextual factors that may influence its implementation and impact. Using a cross-sectional mixed-methods observational approach that combined quantitative and qualitative data, the evaluation found that the kit played a critical role in maintaining continuity of care when other supply chain solutions were disrupted. However, contextual factors such as local communities' unfamiliarity with healthcare facilities, the national integration of NCDs into PHC, and the existence of monitoring and evaluation systems were identified as important considerations for enhancing the WHO-NCDK's utility and usefulness. The evaluation suggests that the WHO-NCDK can be an effective intervention in emergency settings, provided that contextual factors such as local needs, facility capacity and healthcare worker capacity are considered before kit deployments.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesRelief WorkCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareSudanhealth services researchhealth systems evaluationother study designpublic health

Identifiers

PMID37295806
PMCPMC10367079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.