Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294826›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

Development of a dynamic prediction model for unplanned ICU admission and mortality in hospitalized patients.

Davide Placido, Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer, Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Roc Reguant, Søren Brunak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Davide PlacidoNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8838
Hans-Christian Thorsen-MeyerNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Benjamin Skov Kaas-HansenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-0371
Roc ReguantNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0350-3899
Søren BrunakNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-5866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequent assessment of the severity of illness for hospitalized patients is essential in clinical settings to prevent outcomes such as in-hospital mortality and unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Classical severity scores have been developed typically using relatively few patient features. Recently, deep learning-based models demonstrated better individualized risk assessments compared to classic risk scores, thanks to the use of aggregated and more heterogeneous data sources for dynamic risk prediction. We investigated to what extent deep learning methods can capture patterns of longitudinal change in health status using time-stamped data from electronic health records. We developed a deep learning model based on embedded text from multiple data sources and recurrent neural networks to predict the risk of the composite outcome of unplanned ICU transfer and in-hospital death. The risk was assessed at regular intervals during the admission for different prediction windows. Input data included medical history, biochemical measurements, and clinical notes from a total of 852,620 patients admitted to non-intensive care units in 12 hospitals in Denmark's Capital Region and Region Zealand during 2011-2016 (with a total of 2,241,849 admissions). We subsequently explained the model using the Shapley algorithm, which provides the contribution of each feature to the model outcome. The best model used all data modalities with an assessment rate of 6 hours, a prediction window of 14 days and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.898. The discrimination and calibration obtained with this model make it a viable clinical support tool to detect patients at higher risk of clinical deterioration, providing clinicians insights into both actionable and non-actionable patient features.

Identifiers

PMID37294826
PMCPMC10256150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.