Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294804›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Finding motifs using DNA images derived from sparse representations.

Shane K Chu, Gary D Stormo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shane K ChuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8723-3215
Gary D StormoDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6896-1850

Funding

DNA Binding Properties of Zinc Finger ProteinsR01GM125736 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI PETKOV, PETKO M · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMotifs play a crucial role in computational biology, as they provide valuable information about the binding specificity of proteins. However, conventional motif discovery methods typically rely on simple combinatoric or probabilistic approaches, which can be biased by heuristics such as substring-masking for multiple motif discovery. In recent years, deep neural networks have become increasingly popular for motif discovery, as they are capable of capturing complex patterns in data. Nonetheless, inferring motifs from neural networks remains a challenging problem, both from a modeling and computational standpoint, despite the success of these networks in supervised learning tasks.

resultsWe present a principled representation learning approach based on a hierarchical sparse representation for motif discovery. Our method effectively discovers gapped, long, or overlapping motifs that we show to commonly exist in next-generation sequencing datasets, in addition to the short and enriched primary binding sites. Our model is fully interpretable, fast, and capable of capturing motifs in a large number of DNA strings. A key concept emerged from our approach-enumerating at the image level-effectively overcomes the k-mers paradigm, enabling modest computational resources for capturing the long and varied but conserved patterns, in addition to capturing the primary binding sites. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our method is available as a Julia package under the MIT license at https://github.com/kchu25/MOTIFs.jl, and the results on experimental data can be found at https://zenodo.org/record/7783033.

Indexed as

ProteinsSoftwareBinding SitesDNANeural Networks, ComputerDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID37294804
PMCPMC10290554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.