Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294674›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023

Large-Scale Modeling of Sparse Protein Kinase Activity Data.

Sohvi Luukkonen, Erik Meijer, Giovanni A Tricarico, Johan Hofmans, Pieter F W Stouten, Gerard J P van Westen, Eelke B Lenselink

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sohvi LuukkonenLeiden Academic Centre of Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-1427
Erik MeijerLeiden Academic Centre of Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Giovanni A TricaricoGalapagos NV, Generaal De Wittelaan L11 A3, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-7207
Johan HofmansGalapagos NV, Generaal De Wittelaan L11 A3, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-744X
Pieter F W StoutenLeiden Academic Centre of Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5203-2202
Gerard J P van WestenLeiden Academic Centre of Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-1817
Eelke B LenselinkGalapagos NV, Generaal De Wittelaan L11 A3, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-2978
Leiden University · NLGalapagos (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein kinases are a protein family that plays an important role in several complex diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular and immunological diseases. Protein kinases have conserved ATP binding sites, which when targeted can lead to similar activities of inhibitors against different kinases. This can be exploited to create multitarget drugs. On the other hand, selectivity (lack of similar activities) is desirable in order to avoid toxicity issues. There is a vast amount of protein kinase activity data in the public domain, which can be used in many different ways. Multitask machine learning models are expected to excel for these kinds of data sets because they can learn from implicit correlations between tasks (in this case activities against a variety of kinases). However, multitask modeling of sparse data poses two major challenges: (i) creating a balanced train-test split without data leakage and (ii) handling missing data. In this work, we construct a protein kinase benchmark set composed of two balanced splits without data leakage, using random and dissimilarity-driven cluster-based mechanisms, respectively. This data set can be used for benchmarking and developing protein kinase activity prediction models. Overall, the performance on the dissimilarity-driven cluster-based split is lower than on random split-based sets for all models, indicating poor generalizability of models. Nevertheless, we show that multitask deep learning models, on this very sparse data set, outperform single-task deep learning and tree-based models. Finally, we demonstrate that data imputation does not improve the performance of (multitask) models on this benchmark set.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteinsPhosphorylationProtein KinasesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProtein KinasesProteins

Identifiers

PMID37294674
PMCPMC10302492
OpenAlexW4380083000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.